active compute AKT
Akash Network logo

Akash Network

Akash Network review: AKT tokenomics, BME burn live since 23 March 2026, Q1 2026 lease revenue $253K (Messari) vs Akash-reported ~$5M compute spend, named customers (Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus, Gensyn), and the looming Cosmos migration.

A
Quadrant
Best of both
66
Freedom
/100
C
68
Returns
/100
C
Verdict · Sovereignty and returns

The most credible decentralised cloud marketplace operating today. Real revenue, real customers, BME burn live since 23 March 2026. Provider count at network low; chain migration still looming.

Strengths
  • + Longest-running decentralised cloud marketplace with real customers and 128% YoY growth
  • + Fully open source under Apache 2.0 across 65 repos and 350+ contributors
  • + Founder Osuri testified before US Congress on AI energy in May 2025
Risks
  • Chain migration announced by founder, not governance-voted, with no published spec
  • No formal protocol-level security audit disclosed in five years of production
  • Active providers fell to 58 in Q1 2026 (Messari, lowest in network history); capacity contracted across all four resource categories
Freedom Score
C66/100?

Akash scores a C (66/100), reflecting genuine infrastructure decentralisation with functional governance and exemplary open-source practices. The permissionless provider model and active on-chain governance (300+ proposals, community rejecting proposals for transparency) are strong points. Open-source transparency is near-exemplary at 13/15.

However, the small and declining provider set, insider-heavy genesis distribution, upcoming chain migration uncertainty, Starcluster centralisation vectors, and US jurisdiction of Overclock Labs prevent a higher score. The absence of a formal security audit for 5+ year production infrastructure is a material gap. If Akash successfully executes chain migration, activates BME, and grows provider diversity via Homenode, the score would improve materially.

Infrastructure decentralisation
12/20
Evidence
Active validators and provider counts tracked live via Akashstats, Akash Console API, and Cosmos REST API. Permissionless provider onboarding -- anyone with qualifying hardware can join. GPUs deployed across independent providers. Geographic distribution is real. However: average active providers fell to 58 in Q1 2026 per Messari (down 8.4% QoQ from 63; lowest count in recent network history), continuing a multi-quarter consolidation. GPU capacity contracted 57.5% QoQ to 334 average available, CPU capacity 46.5% QoQ, storage 37.5% QoQ, RAM 41.7% QoQ. The compression reflects datacentre operators cutting back capacity that doesn't fit the AI deployments now driving network demand. Starcluster/Starbonds introduces centralisation: protocol-owned compute at enterprise datacentres with 'vetted Nodekeepers'. Akash Homenode opened early access 25 February 2026 (RTX 4090, RTX 5090, Quadro RTX 6000 Ada) as a decentralising force, but adoption metrics not yet available. Chain migration to potentially Solana introduces uncertainty about future validator model. Overclock Labs remains the dominant development entity.
Governance decentralisation
13/20
Evidence
300+ on-chain governance proposals with active participation. Proposal #308 had 42.31% turnout, exceeding 33.4% quorum. Community rejected Proposal #302 (Akash Adoption Lab) for lack of transparency -- governance has real teeth. 50% community pool tax funds community-directed spending. Q1 2026 governance was particularly active: seven proposals approved (315-321), including Proposal 318 (Mainnet 17 / v2.0.0 BME activation) which cleared 6-13 March 2026 with 99.7% YES, and Proposal 316 (1M AKT loan from Community Pool to restore two-sided market depth after the Q4 2025 drawdown). Engineering funding split across three coordinated proposals (319, 320, 321) covering BME AEPs, client-side AEPs (incl. AEP-60 Homenode MVP), and operational services. However: Overclock Labs drives the strategic roadmap. Chain migration was announced by founder, not governance-voted. Greg Osuri is the primary public voice and decision-maker on major strategic direction. Starbonds appears to be a company decision, not community-governed.
Token distribution fairness
8/15
Evidence
Genesis: 34.5% investors, 27% team -- heavily insider-weighted at launch. Long-term: 70.94% of max supply goes to mining/block rewards -- good. All tokens fully vested/unlocked -- no future dilution cliffs. Very modest fundraise ($4.1M total, with IEO component of only $800K). IEO was small with reasonable pricing ($0.3773-$0.7673). Current price (-96% from ATH) means many original investors have lost significantly. Not a fair launch, but the modest fundraise and majority mining allocation are above average.
Censorship resistance
10/15
Evidence
Permissionless provider and tenant participation. No KYC required to deploy or provide. Venice.ai integration demonstrates privacy-preserving compute. Reverse auction is on-chain and transparent. However: Starbonds/Starcluster introduces 'vetted' Nodekeepers -- potential censorship vector at the enterprise GPU layer. Overclock Labs is US-incorporated (Delaware) -- susceptible to US regulatory pressure. Spam attack (March 2025) showed network can be disrupted temporarily. Chain migration adds uncertainty about future censorship properties.
Data sovereignty
10/15
Evidence
Workloads run on provider hardware -- tenants control their deployment configurations and data. No central data collection by Akash protocol. SDL-based deployment gives users full control over infrastructure choices. Self-custodial Cosmos wallets (Keplr/Leap). Provider auditing (Moultrie) does not inspect tenant data. Homenode allows users to control their own hardware. However: providers physically host workloads and could theoretically inspect container contents. No encryption at compute layer. No zero-knowledge or confidential computing. ChainLight vulnerability (patched) showed potential for unauthorised deployment access. AkashML managed inference adds convenience but reduces sovereignty (managed service with centralised API).
Open source transparency
13/15
Evidence
Fully open source under Apache 2.0 licence across 65 repositories. Active development with real commits. Two major upgrades shipped in Q1 2026: Mainnet 16 (4 March 2026, Proposal 317) delivered the CometBFT Tachyon security fix, store migration to typed indexed maps with secondary indexes, and on-chain recording of lease close reasons; Mainnet 17 (23 March 2026, Proposal 318, v2.0.0) activated the BME tokenomics framework, shipping AEP-76 (BME loop), AEP-78 (CosmWasm smart contracts), AEP-80 (Cosmos SDK oracle module with TWAP), and AEP-81 (Pyth AKT-USD feed via Wormhole 13-of-19 guardian quorum). All governance proposals public on GitHub. Quarterly reports published via Messari and internal blog. On-chain governance is transparent and verifiable. Revenue and provider metrics publicly accessible via Akashstats. Community development funded from community pool (50% of inflation). However: no formal protocol-level security audit despite 5+ years of operation. Overclock Labs' corporate financials not public. Starbonds introduces a new opaque financial dimension.
Returns Score
C 68/100 ?

Overall returns potential is moderate at 68/100. Strongest dimension: token utility (16/20). Weakest: revenue sustainability (14/25).

Token utility
16/20
Evidence
Payment for compute, staking for governance/security, validator requirement.
Value accrual
14/20
Evidence
Take rate on compute fees. BME live since 23 March 2026 (Mainnet 17, Proposal 318). 53,520 AKT burned through 31 March 2026 per Messari; daily average ~5,950 AKT across that nine-day window. Vault seeded with 300,000 AKT from Community Pool. Functioning burn mechanism tied to lease revenue; the scale question is the open one.
Supply dynamics
14/20
Evidence
Uncapped supply. Annualised inflation 8.94% in Q1 2026 per Messari (up from 8.12% Q4 2025; the 8% headline is the Proposal 283 cap, not the realised rate). BME burns offset a fraction of issuance at current usage levels. All vesting complete. Deflationary only if compute spend scales by an order of magnitude.
Revenue sustainability
14/25
Evidence
Real customers (Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus, Gensyn). Q1 2026 figures co-exist: Messari (Akashstats + Artemis source) reports lease revenue of $253,250 (down 45% QoQ); Akash self-reports ~$5M compute spend over the same period (broader scope, likely gross spend). New leases recovered for the third consecutive quarter (43,540 in Q1 2026, +27.1% QoQ per Messari) but active leases and provider count both compressed. Revenue-to-emission ratio remains thin against 8.94% annualised inflation.
Liquidity & access
10/15
Evidence
Coinbase, Kraken, KuCoin. No Binance. Moderate liquidity; adequate for mid-size positions. Community Pool authorised a 1M AKT loan in March 2026 (Proposal 316) to restore two-sided market depth after the Q4 2025 drawdown.
Quadrant A — Best of both ?
Price
$0.540
Market Cap
$156.5M
FDV
$157.8M
24h Change
-18.2%
-18.2%
OYM holds AKT. This review reflects genuine assessment, not promotional interest.

Not financial advice. Scores are opinions, not recommendations. Crypto is high-risk – you could lose everything you invest. Full disclaimer.

Token Details
AKTCosmos SDK v0.53 + CometBFT (Mainnet 14, October 2025)
· Updated
On this page
Listen to this episode
Value Loop

Reverse-auction compute market with burn-mint settlement

Permissionless cloud-compute marketplace on a Cosmos appchain. Tenants describe containerised workloads in SDL and post AKT escrow; providers bid via reverse auction with the lowest qualifying bid winning; AKT spent on compute is burned and new AKT minted to providers under BME (Burn-Mint Equilibrium, live since 23 March 2026); validators stake AKT to secure the chain.

AKT Value Loop Reverse-auction compute market with burn-mint settlement TENANT DEMAND SDL workloads + escrow on-chain order matching REVERSE AUCTION lowest qualifying bid permissionless supply BME BURN-MINT tenant AKT burned new AKT minted to providers STAKE + SECURE validators bond AKT 21-day unbond · slashing BURN-MINT EQUILIBRIUM Tenant spend burns AKT, providers earn fresh mints, supply tracks usage. PROTOCOL DESIGN 100M AKT GENESIS → ~294M circulating today no hard cap · ongoing inflation INFLATION 8% nominal cap 50% pool tax offset by BME burn rate BME MECHANISM AKT spend burned new AKT minted to providers STAKING validator bond + voting 21-day unbond · slashing risk DEMAND SOURCE containerised workloads, GPU + CPU + storage rental BME Burn-Mint Equilibrium SDL Stack Definition Language ownyourmind.ai/projects/akash Independent DeAI Research

What it does

Akash is a decentralised cloud computing marketplace built on a Cosmos SDKSDKSoftware Development Kit. A collection of code libraries, documentation, and tools that lets developers integrate a service into their applications without writing everything from scratch. SDKs are how projects become easy to build with.Like a plug-and-play kit for building furniture. You don't have to mill your own wood, forge your own screws, or design the joinery from scratch. The kit gives you pre-cut parts and instructions so you can assemble the thing in an afternoon.Read more → appchain. Providers list spare GPUGPUGraphics Processing Unit. Originally designed to render video game graphics, GPUs turned out to be exceptionally good at the massively parallel math that AI models need. Modern AI training and inference runs almost entirely on GPUs.Like a factory with 10,000 workers doing the same simple task in parallel, versus a CPU which is more like 10 workers each doing different complex tasks. AI training involves doing simple math a million times per second on a million numbers, which is exactly what the GPU factory is designed for.Read more →, CPU, memory and storage capacity. Tenants describe workloads in SDL (a YAML-based Stack Definition Language), submit deployment orders on-chain, and providers bid via reverse auction. Lowest qualifying bid wins. Workloads run in Kubernetes containers on provider hardware.

The chain handles order matching, escrow payments and provider attestationAttestationA cryptographic proof that a piece of code is running on a specific hardware enclave in an unmodified state. Attestation lets remote users verify that a service is genuinely running what it claims to be running.Like a tamper-evident seal on a medicine bottle. The seal itself doesn't make the medicine safe, but it gives you a way to verify that nobody opened the bottle and swapped the contents before you bought it.Read more →. Actual compute happens off-chain. GPU marketplace launched in September 2023 with NVIDIA support. AkashML managed inferenceInferenceRunning a trained AI model to produce an answer. Inference is what happens when you type a prompt into ChatGPT and get a response. The model takes your input, computes a best guess, and returns it.Like asking an expert for their opinion. The training was the decades they spent becoming an expert. The inference is the 30 seconds it takes them to answer your specific question.Read more → service followed, simplifying AI modelModelA trained neural network that takes inputs (text, images, audio) and produces outputs (more text, classifications, generated content). In DeAI the model is the thing that actually does the work.Like a very experienced apprentice who has spent years watching thousands of masters make furniture. They can't explain how they know when a joint is right, but they can make a chair that looks and functions like a Chippendale. The training is invisible. The output is what matters.Read more → deployment for tenants who don’t want to wrangle Kubernetes themselves.

Founded by Greg Osuri and Adam Bozanich through Overclock Labs, a Delaware-incorporated company (June 2015). Osuri founded AngelHack, a major hackathon organisation (160,000-plus developers per AngelHack’s site), and has over 10,000 GitHub contributions. He testified before the US Congress House Committee on AI energy in May 2025, one of the few decentralised cloud founders to do so. The team has grown to roughly 115 people. Mainnet has been running since September 2020, making Akash one of the longest-running decentralised cloud marketplaces in the space.

Value proposition

Cheaper than hyperscalers

50-85% cheaper than AWS, GCP and Azure. Reverse auction drives prices down because providers compete for your deployment.

Permissionless supply

Anyone with qualifying hardware can become a provider. No approval process, no relationship required.

Named customers, dual revenue figures

Q1 2026: $253K lease revenue (Messari) vs $5M Akash compute spend (different scope). New leases +27.1% QoQ. Customers: Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus, Gensyn.

Cost. Akash compute runs 50-85% cheaper than AWS, GCP and Azure for comparable workloads. The reverse auction model drives prices down because providers compete for your deployment rather than you accepting a posted rate.

Permissionless supply is the structural differentiator. Anyone with qualifying hardware can become a provider. No approval process, no relationship required, no geographic restrictions. This is the opposite of how Render operates, where node operators need Foundation approval.

For the sovereignty thesis, the value is clear: you deploy containerised workloads on infrastructure that no single entity controls, pay with a self-custodial walletWalletSoftware that stores the private keys needed to control tokens on a blockchain. A wallet does not actually hold any tokens. The tokens live on the chain. The wallet holds the keys that prove you own them.Like the key to a safe deposit box. The key doesn't contain your valuables. The valuables sit in the bank's vault. The key is what proves you're allowed to open the box and take them.Read more →, and no platform collects data about what you are running. Venice uses Akash GPUs for its inference workloads. Morpheus routes compute through Akash providers. ElizaOS runs AI agents on the network. These are real customers generating real revenue, not testnet experiments.

The counter-narrative is scale. Average active providers fell to 58 in Q1 2026 per Messari, the lowest count in the network’s recent history (down from 63 in Q4 2025 and 69 a year earlier). Average GPU capacity sits at 334 units, with 84 in active use. AWS has millions of GPUs.

The “decentralised AWS” framing is aspirational. The reality is a functional but small marketplace that serves a specific niche: developers and projects that value permissionless deployment over managed services. GPU utilisation in Q1 2026 was 33.7% per Messari (flat against Q4 2025), the highest utilisation rate across the four resource classes but with the absolute base measured in tens of GPUs rather than thousands.

Akash Homenode opened early access on 25 February 2026, accepting consumer and prosumer cards (RTX 4090, RTX 5090, and Quadro RTX 6000 Ada) to expand the supply base. The Akash Agents platform launched on 26 March 2026, providing one-click AI agent deployment on permissionless compute and seeded with OpenClaw and Nous Research’s Hermes. Both are structural responses to the provider attrition and the AI workload mix that now drives demand, but adoption metrics are not yet available.

Tokenomics

Circulating supply Live · CoinGecko · 1 Jun 2026
292.1M
Circulating
99.23% of total
294.3M
Total supply

AKT launched via IEO on BitMax (now AscendEX) in October 2020 at $0.38-$0.77 per tokenTokenA digital unit of value or access rights tracked on a blockchain. Tokens can represent ownership in a project, a right to use a service, a share of future revenue, or simply a tradable asset with no underlying claim.Like a physical poker chip a casino issues. The chip itself has no value. What makes it worth something is what it lets you do at the casino, what the casino has promised, and how much other people will pay you for it.Read more →. Total raise across all rounds: $4.1 million ($1.31 million seed from CrunchFund in 2017, $2 million private sale in 2019, roughly $800,000 IEO). By crypto standards, this is tiny, and that matters. Low funding means less VCVCVenture Capital. Private investors who fund projects at an early stage in exchange for equity or token allocations. VC rounds are typically pre-launch, at steep discounts to any future public price, with multi-year vesting.Like angel investors in a startup who buy shares before the company goes public. They take more risk because the company might fail, so they get a better price. Once the company IPOs they can sell, and the public market pays whatever price it thinks is fair.Read more → overhang, less misaligned incentive, and less pressure to juice metrics for investor returns.

Genesis supply was 100 million AKT. Long-term distribution of max supply:

  • MiningProof of WorkThe original blockchain consensus mechanism where miners compete to solve computationally expensive puzzles. The winner proposes the next block and earns the rewards. Proof of Work secures Bitcoin and most pre-2020 chains.Like a lottery that runs every 10 minutes where the tickets cost electricity. Whoever spends the most electricity buying lottery tickets has the best chance of winning that round's prize. Nobody can fake the result because the proof of their work is verifiable by everyone.Read more → (block rewardsEmissionsNew tokens created and distributed by a blockchain protocol over time as rewards to validators, stakers, or miners. Emissions fund network security and participation at the cost of diluting existing holders.Like a company that pays employees partly in newly printed shares. Every year the total number of shares goes up, which means existing shareholders own a slightly smaller slice of the same company unless the company grows faster than the printing.Read more →): 70.94%
  • Investors: 10.03% (1-year lock, graded release, fully vested)
  • Team and advisors: 7.85% (1-year lock, graduated release, fully vested)
  • Foundation: 5.72% (fully vested)
  • Ecosystem: 2.32%
  • Testnets: 1.45%
  • Vendors and marketing: 1.16%
  • Public sale (IEO): 0.52%

The current circulating supplyCirculating SupplyThe number of tokens currently in circulation and tradeable on the open market. Differs from total supply (which includes locked or unvested tokens) and max supply (the upper limit, if there is one).Like the number of cars on the road today versus the number ever produced. Some are in showrooms, some in junkyards, some still at the factory. Only the ones on the road count toward what people are actually driving.Read more → is shown above. All initial allocations are now fully vested. InflationInflationThe annual rate at which new tokens are created and added to the circulating supply. Most networks use inflation to pay validators, stakers, and infrastructure providers from freshly minted tokens rather than real revenue.Like a landlord who raises the rent every year. If your salary goes up at the same rate, you break even. If it doesn't, you get poorer without noticing, because the number on your payslip hasn't changed but the ground under it has shifted.Read more → is capped at 8% annually under Proposal 283 (March 2025), with a 50% community pool tax meaning half of issuance goes to community-directed spending. Messari reports annualised inflation of 8.94% in Q1 2026 (up from 8.12% in Q4 2025), so the realised rate runs slightly above the cap because of how the cap is computed against changing bonded ratios.

The tokenomics thesis hinges on BME (Burn-Mint EquilibriumBurn-Mint EquilibriumA tokenomics model where network fees burn tokens while new tokens are minted and paid to suppliers. The system tries to balance burns and mints so circulating supply stays roughly stable when usage scales.Like a business that spends a dollar of revenue for every dollar of wages it pays. Money flows in and out at the same rate, so the total cash in the company stays flat. The rate of flow tells you how big the business is.Read more →), which activated on 23 March 2026 via Mainnet 17 (Proposal 318, v2.0.0, cleared governance with 99.7% YES). The framework retired the legacy x/take module: every onchain compute lease now routes through an AKT market buy, with the purchased token burned to mint ACT (Akash Compute Token), a non-transferable settlement unit denominated in USD that sits in the BME Vault for the duration of the lease. Providers receive ACT as payment and redeem it back to AKT at the prevailing market price when the lease settles, so when AKT appreciates between top-up and payout the system burns net AKT, tying the burn magnitude directly to network activity.

Messari reports 53,520 AKT burned through BME from activation (23 March 2026) to quarter-end (31 March 2026), averaging roughly 5,950 AKT per day across that nine-day window. The Vault was seeded with 300,000 AKT from the Community Pool. Four AEPs shipped in the same upgrade: AEP-76 (the BME loop), AEP-78 (CosmWasm smart contracts so BME executes as auditable, upgradable contract code), AEP-80 (a native Cosmos SDK oracle module with TWAP and staleness guardrails), and AEP-81 (Pyth’s AKT-USD feed via a Wormhole 13-of-19 guardian quorum). The dual-feed oracle architecture (Pyth via Wormhole, plus Osmosis TWAP) is designed to make BME settlement resilient to single-source price manipulation.

The deflationary question is whether compute spend can scale enough to outpace 8.94% annualised issuance. Messari’s Q1 2026 lease revenue figure of $253,250 (down 45% QoQ) annualises to roughly $1.01M, well below the burn level needed for meaningful supply contraction. The gap between functioning mechanism and meaningful deflation is the core investment question.

StakingStakingLocking up a cryptocurrency to help secure a blockchain network, usually in exchange for rewards. The locked tokens act as a security deposit that can be taken away if the staker misbehaves.Like putting down a large rental deposit for an apartment. You get the money back if you behave, you earn interest while it's locked, and the landlord takes it if you trash the place.Read more → yields roughly 7.3% APY nominal, which is approximately -1.6% to -0.9% real yield against Messari’s 8.94% Q1 2026 annualised inflation rate, before accounting for the 50% community pool tax. Messari reports 37.99% of circulating supply staked at quarter-end (down from 38.03% in Q4 2025). The 21-day unbonding period locks capital during volatile markets. Slashing risk exists: 5% for double-signing, 0.01% for prolonged downtime.

Starbonds, a $75 million securities offering (Reg A+ filing) announced in 2025, is the elephant in the room. This is a corporate fundraise by Overclock Labs. Terms are not yet fully public. Whatever the structure, it represents significant new capital flowing into the entity that controls the development roadmap, and introduces an opaque financial dimension alongside the transparent on-chain economics.

Listed on Coinbase, Kraken and KuCoin but notably absent from Binance, which limits Asian market liquidityLiquidityHow easily a token can be bought or sold without moving the price. High liquidity means you can enter or exit large positions quickly at the quoted price. Low liquidity means even small trades can swing the market.Like the difference between selling a house and selling a share of Apple stock. The house might be worth more on paper, but finding a buyer at that price takes weeks. The Apple share converts to cash in one click.Read more → and retail discovery. DEXDEXDecentralised Exchange. A trading venue where token swaps happen entirely through smart contracts, with no central operator holding user funds. The largest DEXes are Uniswap, Aerodrome, Raydium, PancakeSwap, and Curve.Like a self-service vending machine that lets you swap one type of coin for another. The machine sets the exchange rate based on its current stock, anyone can deposit coins to refill it, and there's no clerk behind the counter.Read more → liquidity on Osmosis is moderate. Proposal 316 (passed March 2026) authorised a 1M AKT loan from the Community Pool to restore two-sided market depth that had compressed alongside the Q4 2025 drawdown; the loan-call structure introduces no net sell pressure.

Grayscale added AKT to its AI Tools and Resources sector index in May 2025, and Coinbase included AKT in the Coinbase 50 Index in June 2025. Per Messari, AKT rallied 41.6% QoQ in Q1 2026, with the move concentrated around the BME activation date (23 March 2026). See live data above for current pricing.

How to participate

Beginner
Stake AKT
Intermediate
Deploy workloads
Advanced
Provide compute

Stake AKT. Delegate to validators on the Akash chain. Earn inflation rewards (~7.3% APY nominal, near zero real yield after inflation and community pool tax). Vote on governance proposals through your validatorValidatorA computer that runs the full blockchain protocol, verifies transactions, and proposes new blocks. Validators are the workers that keep a Proof of Stake network running, and they earn rewards for doing the work correctly.Like a notary public who witnesses and stamps legal documents. Validators witness transactions, check they follow the rules, and stamp them into the permanent record. A notary who commits fraud loses their license. Validators work the same way, except the license is staked tokens that get slashed on misbehaviour.Read more → or directly. Requires a Cosmos wallet (Keplr). Minimum stake is negligible. The main consideration is the 21-day unbonding period.

Provide compute. Run a provider node and list spare capacity on the marketplace. Permissionless, anyone with qualifying hardware can join. Requires server-grade hardware, Kubernetes administration skills, NVIDIA GPUs for GPU workloads, and reliable internet. This is the more interesting participation mode if you have idle hardware, but the technical barrier is real.

Deploy workloads. Use Akash as a tenant. Describe your workload in SDL, submit to the marketplace, and providers bid. Typically 50-85% cheaper than centralised cloud. Requires Docker/container knowledge and an AKT deposit for escrow. No managed services (databases, load balancers, CDN), just raw compute.

Build. Four funding mechanisms: Community Pool (on-chain treasury), Akash Accelerate (grants programme), Akash Bounties Board and AkashML partnerships. Go and Kubernetes expertise preferred.

Honest assessment

What works

Akash is the most credible decentralised cloud marketplace operating today. That’s a factual statement, not an endorsement.

Messari’s full-year 2025 report showed $3.15 million in annual revenue, up 128% year-over-year. The Q1 2026 picture is mixed: Messari (sourced from Akashstats and Artemis) reports lease revenue of $253,250 for the quarter, down 45% QoQ from $460,510 in Q4 2025. Akash separately reports ~$5 million Q1 2026 “compute spend” through its own dashboards; the two figures likely measure different scopes (gross spend across all categories vs lease revenue collected by the protocol) and the gap is not yet reconciled publicly. Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus and Gensyn are verifiable, named customers deploying real workloads.

The permissionless provider model is structurally sound: anyone with qualifying hardware can join. Fully open source under Apache 2.0 across 65 repositories with 350-plus contributors. Two consequential upgrades shipped in Q1 2026: Mainnet 16 (4 March 2026) delivered the CometBFT Tachyon security fix and store migration; Mainnet 17 (23 March 2026) activated the BME framework, shipping four AEPs in a single coordinated upgrade. The Akash Agents platform (launched 26 March 2026) and Homenode early-access (25 February 2026) broaden the addressable market on both supply and demand sides.

Osuri’s background carries genuine credibility: AngelHack founder, congressional testimony on AI energy in May 2025. Listed on Coinbase and Kraken. Cosmos-based on-chain governanceDAODecentralised Autonomous Organisation. A way to coordinate decisions and manage a treasury using token-weighted voting instead of a traditional company structure. Token holders propose and vote on changes directly.Like a shareholder-run company where every shareholder can vote on every decision, the votes are public, and the company can't do anything the shareholders don't approve. The coordination is messier than a normal company but nobody has unilateral control.Read more → with real participation: 300-plus proposals, seven approved in Q1 2026 alone (Mainnet 17 cleared with 99.7% YES), and the community rejected Proposal #302 for lack of transparency, showing governance has actual teeth.

What doesn’t work yet

The active provider count isn’t a cloud marketplace. Messari’s Q1 2026 figure is 58 average active providers, the lowest in the network’s recent history and down 8.4% QoQ. Provider concentration means a handful of large operators serve the majority of capacity. Compute capacity contracted across all four resource categories in Q1 2026: GPU capacity -57.5% QoQ, CPU -46.5%, storage -37.5%, RAM -41.7%. CPU utilisation rose to 26.1% (from 17.7% in Q4 2025) because providers cut idle capacity faster than usage fell, not because demand grew.

The revenue picture is similarly compressed. Messari Q1 2026 lease revenue of $253,250 annualises to roughly $1.01M; even if the broader Akash-reported $5 million Q1 spend captures something real that Messari doesn’t, the gap between the figures is itself a transparency problem. No managed services limits enterprise adoption to teams comfortable with raw compute. GPU utilisation at 33.7% (Messari Q1 2026) reflects verifiable demand but across an average of 84 GPUs in active use, which is a rounding error against hyperscaler capacity.

The risk

Chain deprecation is the single highest-impact risk. Akash plans to deprecate its Cosmos chain in late 2026 and migrate to a new chain, with Solana mentioned as a “strong contender” but no governance vote conducted. Migrating an entire blockchain and marketplace is technically complex, operationally destabilising, and could fracture the community. There’s no published technical specification. The proper word for the migration is rebuild.

On 16 April 2026, founder Greg Osuri publicly stated that Cosmos management changed the licence on a critical SDK component to prohibit commercial use without an enterprise licence. Osuri described the terms as “hostile.” This escalates the migration from a planned strategic pivot to something closer to a forced move: if Cosmos enforces the new licence terms against Akash, the timeline for departure becomes reactive rather than planned. The destination chain (Solana remains the public frontrunner) and the technical migration path are still not specified in any governance proposal.

No formal protocol-level security audit has been disclosed despite the network operating since 2020. That’s five-plus years of production infrastructure without a commissioned security review. The ChainLight authentication bypass vulnerability discovered in May 2024 demonstrates the attack surface is real. A spam attack in March 2025 caused degraded performance, though the network recovered.

Overclock Labs is a US-incorporated entity (Delaware), exposing the project to SEC, CFTC and compute export regulations. Osuri is the key person risk. He’s the public face, strategic driver and open-source credibility anchor. The Starbonds offering introduces new dilution and regulatory dimensions that aren’t yet fully transparent.

My position

I hold AKT. I also have indirect exposure through Venice (which uses Akash GPUs) and Morpheus (which routes compute through Akash providers). The chain migration introduces uncertainty but I believe the project’s technical credibility and real revenue justify the position.

Freedom Score: 66/100

Akash scores 66/100 (C grade). Full methodology at Freedom Score Methodology.

Infrastructure decentralisation (12/20): Active validators and provider counts are tracked live in the metrics above. Permissionless provider onboarding with GPUs across independent providers. Geographic distribution is real. But the provider count is objectively thin and declined through 2025. Starcluster/Starbonds introduces centralisation via enterprise datacentres with “vetted Nodekeepers”. Homenode (Feb 2026 beta) is a decentralising force but too new to measure.

Governance decentralisation (13/20): 300+ on-chain governance proposals with active participation. Proposal #308 had 42.31% turnout, exceeding 33.4% quorum. Community rejected Proposal #302 for lack of transparency, which shows governance has real teeth. 50% community pool tax funds community-directed spending. But Overclock Labs drives the strategic roadmap. Chain migration was announced by the founder, not governance-voted.

Token distribution fairness (8/15): Genesis was insider-heavy (34.5% investors, 27% team) but long-term allocation is better: 70.94% of max supply goes to mining/blockBlockA batch of transactions added to a blockchain at a set interval. Each block cryptographically links to the previous one, creating an append-only chain that can't be rewritten without redoing all the work since.Like a page in a ledger. Every page has a fixed number of entries, every page references the previous page, and once a page is filled and signed off it can't be edited without visibly invalidating every page that came after. The chain is just a very long series of these sealed pages.Read more → rewards. All tokens now fully vested. Total raise was modest by any standard ($4.1M). Not a fair launchFair LaunchA token launch where everyone has the same access from day one. No private sale, no insider allocation, no VC discount. Tokens are distributed by mining, staking, or open public sale at a single price.Like a 100m sprint where everyone starts behind the same line at the same time. Some runners are faster, but nobody gets to start 10 metres ahead because they paid extra. The race is decided by the run, not by who bought the best position.Read more →, but the small raise and majority mining allocation are above average.

Censorship resistance (10/15): Permissionless provider and tenant participation. No KYC required. Reverse auction is on-chain and transparent. But Starcluster introduces “vetted Nodekeepers” as a potential censorship vector. Overclock Labs is US-incorporated (Delaware) and subject to regulatory pressure. Spam attack (March 2025) demonstrated the network can be degraded temporarily.

Data sovereignty (10/15): Tenants fully control deployment configurations and data. Self-custodial Cosmos wallets. No central data collection by the protocol. Homenode lets users control their own hardware. But providers physically host workloads and could theoretically inspect containers. No encryption at the compute layer. ChainLight vulnerability (patched) showed potential for unauthorised deployment access.

Open source and transparency (13/15): Fully open source under Apache 2.0 across 65 repositories. Active development with real commits across two Q1 2026 mainnet upgrades: Mainnet 16 (4 March 2026, Proposal 317) delivered the CometBFT Tachyon security fix and store migration; Mainnet 17 (23 March 2026, Proposal 318, v2.0.0) activated BME and shipped four AEPs (76, 78, 80, 81) covering the burn loop, CosmWasm smart contracts, the Cosmos SDK oracle module, and the Pyth feed. All governance proposals public on GitHub. Quarterly Messari reports and internal blog provide regular transparency. Near-exemplary. But no formal security audit despite five-plus years of operation. Overclock Labs’ corporate financials not public. Starbonds introduces an opaque financial dimension.

Path to improvement

Three changes would materially increase Akash’s score:

  1. Commission a formal security audit. Five years of production infrastructure without a third-party security review is indefensible. The ChainLight vulnerability proved the attack surface exists. An audit by a credible firm would address the most obvious gap in Akash’s otherwise strong transparency position.
  2. Execute the chain migration transparently. Publish a technical specification. Run a governance vote on the destination chain. Provide a detailed migration timeline with milestones. The current state, aspirational timelines with no published roadmap, creates justified uncertainty.
  3. Grow the provider count. Messari Q1 2026 puts average active providers at 58, the lowest in the network’s recent history. Homenode (consumer hardware) and the Akash Agents platform (agentic AI workloads) broaden both the supply and demand sides. The target should be hundreds of active providers across multiple geographies before claiming the “decentralised AWS” positioning with a straight face.

Returns Score: 68/100

AKT scores 68/100 (C grade). Full methodology at Returns Score Methodology.

Token utility (16/20): AKT serves three clear functions: payment for compute on the marketplace, staking for validator security and governance, and a requirement for running validator infrastructure. Tenants pay in AKT (or USDC, with AKT settlement), and validators must bond AKT to participate. The utility is genuine and structurally necessary. The network can’t function without the token. The gap to a perfect score is the lack of a broader demand sink beyond compute settlement and staking.

Value accrual (14/20): BME activated 23 March 2026 (Mainnet 17, Proposal 318), and the numbers are now on-chain rather than theoretical. Messari reports 53,520 AKT burned through 31 March 2026, averaging roughly 5,950 AKT per day across the nine-day window. The Vault was seeded with 300,000 AKT from the Community Pool. The legacy x/take module was retired in the same upgrade; the take-rate logic now resides in BME. Every dollar of compute spend routes through an AKT market buy, with the purchased token burned to mint ACT (Akash Compute Token). Staking yields roughly 7.3% nominal (approximately -0.9% to -1.6% real yield against Messari’s 8.94% Q1 2026 annualised inflation). The “coming soon” qualifier is gone. BME is live and burning. The gap to a higher score is scale: at Messari’s Q1 2026 lease revenue run rate (~$1.01M annualised), burns offset only a fraction of issuance.

Supply dynamics (14/20): AKT has no hard cap. Inflation is capped at 8% under Proposal 283 (March 2025); Messari reports annualised inflation of 8.94% in Q1 2026 (up from 8.12% in Q4 2025), with realised rates running slightly above the cap because of how the cap is computed against bonded ratios. The 388.5 million genesis cap isn’t a ceiling but a starting point. BME burned 53,520 AKT in the first nine days post-activation per Messari, a meaningful start but small against the issuance rate. All initial investor and team allocations are fully vested, which removes cliff-dump risk. The 50% community pool tax redirects half of issuance to community spending, which is good governance but does not reduce supply pressure. The token remains inflationary at current adoption levels. Meaningful deflation requires a step-change in compute revenue.

Revenue sustainability (14/25): Two figures co-exist for Q1 2026 and the gap matters. Messari (sourced from Akashstats and Artemis) reports lease revenue of $253,250 in Q1 2026, down 45% QoQ from $460,510 in Q4 2025, annualising to roughly $1.01M. Akash separately reports ~$5 million Q1 2026 “compute spend” through its own dashboards; the broader figure likely captures gross spend across all categories rather than lease revenue collected by the protocol. The full-year 2025 Messari figure remains $3.15 million, up 128% YoY. Real customers (Venice, ElizaOS, Morpheus, Gensyn) generate real workloads, which is the foundation. The flow signal is positive: new lease creation reached 43,540 in Q1 2026, the third consecutive quarter of sequential growth per Messari. The stock signal is negative: active leases and provider count both compressed. Revenue-to-emission ratio remains thin against 8.94% annualised inflation; the gap between “working product” and “sustainable economy” remains wide.

Liquidity and access (10/15): AKT is listed on Coinbase and Kraken, which provides reasonable access for Western retail and institutional buyers. Volume is adequate for moderate position sizes without excessive slippageSlippageThe difference between the expected price of a trade and the price you actually get when the trade executes. Slippage usually goes against the trader and gets worse with bigger trades or thinner markets.Like trying to buy 1000 bananas at the corner shop. The first few are at the marked price, but by the time you've bought them all you've moved the price up because there are no more bananas left at the original level. The shop has to restock at higher cost.Read more →. The notable absence is Binance, the largest exchange by volume, which limits Asian market discovery and liquidity depth. DEXDEXDecentralised Exchange. A trading venue where token swaps happen entirely through smart contracts, with no central operator holding user funds. The largest DEXes are Uniswap, Aerodrome, Raydium, PancakeSwap, and Curve.Like a self-service vending machine that lets you swap one type of coin for another. The machine sets the exchange rate based on its current stock, anyone can deposit coins to refill it, and there's no clerk behind the counter.Read more → liquidity on Osmosis is moderate. Proposal 316 (passed March 2026) authorised a 1M AKT loan from the Community Pool to restore two-sided market depth that had compressed alongside the Q4 2025 drawdown. The loan-call structure introduces no net sell pressure. Per Messari, AKT-denominated network fees fell 23.5% QoQ in Q1 2026 to 635,900 AKT while USD fees fell 44% to $257,580. Not thin enough to be a problem, not deep enough to be a strength.

Path to improvement

Three changes would materially increase Akash’s returns score:

  1. Reverse provider attrition. Active providers at 58 in Q1 2026 is the lowest count in the network’s recent history per Messari. Homenode (early access 25 February 2026) and the Akash Agents platform (26 March 2026) are structural responses on supply and demand sides. The test is whether BME’s onchain demand mechanics translate into improved unit economics fast enough to draw enterprise-grade capacity back, ideally returning the provider count above 100.
  2. Secure a Binance listing. The absence from the world’s largest exchange is a concrete liquidity constraint. Binance coverage would meaningfully increase daily volume, improve price discovery, and expand Akash’s visibility in Asian markets where much of the retail crypto activity occurs.
  3. Reconcile and scale the revenue figure. The Akash-reported and Messari-reported Q1 2026 numbers differ by roughly an order of magnitude because they measure different scopes. Reconciliation (publishing both figures with definitions, or aligning on a single shared definition) would remove the transparency overhang. Either way, growing annualised lease revenue toward $30 million would make the BME burn mechanism economically meaningful and support a credible value accrual narrative.

Score change log

DateScoreChangeReason
2026-05-26DataN/AQ1 2026 refresh from Messari “State of Akash Network Q1 2026” report (May 15, 2026, data as of 31 March 2026, primarily sourced from Akashstats + Artemis). Added independent figures with “as of” anchors and source attribution for evergreen reading: lease revenue $253,250 (-45% QoQ), 58 average active providers (lowest in network history), 33.7% GPU utilisation (not 60% as previously cited), 8.94% annualised inflation (not 8%), 53,520 AKT burned through BME in first nine days. Corrected Mainnet 16 vs Mainnet 17 attribution (Mainnet 16 = Tachyon security fix + store migration; Mainnet 17 = BME activation + AEPs 76/78/80/81). Added Akash Agents platform (26 March 2026) and Homenode early-access details (25 February 2026, RTX 4090/5090/Quadro RTX 6000 Ada). Revenue gap between Akash-reported ~$5M Q1 compute spend and Messari $253K Q1 lease revenue retained side-by-side per the dual-attribution decision. No score change; score boundaries are not crossed but several dimensions are flagged for reassessment at the next monthly review (Returns Sustainability if Akash publishes a reconciliation; Freedom Infrastructure if provider count stabilises post-BME).
2026-05-03EditorialN/ARevenue figure refresh: Q1 2026 compute spend hit $5M ATH per Akash’s own data, prior $3.15M annual figure was stale. Cosmos licensing dispute (16 April 2026, Greg Osuri public statement) added to chain migration discussion as material new risk. No score change yet; June review will reassess Returns Sustainability and Freedom Open Source dimensions if migration timeline accelerates.
2026-05-03DataN/ARemoved hardcoded circulating supply figure from prose. Live figure now served by CirculatingSupply component (CoinGecko).
2026-04-06Returns62 → 68BME live on-chain 23 March 2026. Value Accrual 10→14 (functioning burn mechanism). Supply Dynamics 12→14 (effective inflation reduced to ~7.1%).
2026-03-07Returns66 → 62Returns methodology v2.0 correction. Revenue sustainability 18→14 (revenue-to-emission ratio below 0.5; prior score overstated).
2026-03-02Bothn/aInitial publish. Freedom 66/100, Returns 66/100.

Score changes, new reviews, one editorial take every two weeks. No spam.

Team overview

Greg Osuri CEO & Co-Founder doxxed

IBM consultant (2006-2008), Kaiser Permanente cloud architect (2008), founded AngelHack (world's largest hackathon org, 100k+ developers across 50 cities), co-founded Overclock Labs (June 2015). Testified before US Congress House Committee on AI energy crisis (May 21, 2025). Contributed to California blockchain legislation. Over 10,000 GitHub contributions.

https://x.com/gregosuri
Adam Bozanich CTO & Co-Founder doxxed

QA Automation Engineer at Symantec (2005), Senior Security Engineer at Mu Dynamics (2006), Software Engineer at Xoopit (2008), Lead Software Architect at CHNL Inc. (2011), independent consultant (2012-2014), co-founded Overclock Labs (2015/2016). US patent holder for network protocol fuzzing. Deep expertise in Go, Kubernetes, security.

Overclock Labs, Inc. (Delaware, USA (incorporated June 2015)) · ~115 people
CrunchFundTuesday CapitalAuren Hoffman (angel)Kevin Lin (angel, Twitch co-founder)Cypher CapitalHiro SystemsCosmostation
Total raised: $4.1M
Round Amount Date Lead
Seed $1.3M 2017-11 CrunchFund
Private sale $2.0M 2019 --
IEO (Initial Exchange Offering) $800K 2020-10-15 AscendEX (BitMax)

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-06-01

Technical snapshot

Akash is a four-layer architecture built on a Cosmos SDK appchain (v0.53 + CometBFT, as of Mainnet 14 October 2025). Layer 1 (Blockchain): handles deployment orders, bid placement, lease finalisation, payment settlement, and governance via DPoS consensus. Layer 2 (Application): on-chain records for Deployments, Orders, Bids, and Leases with unique identifiers (DSEQ, OSEQ, GSEQ). Layer 3 (Provider): off-chain Provider Daemon software manages interaction with the chain; Kubernetes orchestration runs Docker containers on provider hardware. Layer 4 (User): Akash Console (web), CLI, AkashML API (OpenAI-compatible managed inference at $0.15/M tokens), and SDL (YAML) configuration. The reverse auction mechanism is the core innovation: tenants publish resource requirements, providers bid competitively, lowest qualifying bid wins, and a lease is created on-chain. Actual compute execution is entirely off-chain.

Consensus Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) via CometBFT (formerly Tendermint). 99 active validators (out of 270 total). ~6 second block time. 167,700 active delegations.
Chain Cosmos SDK v0.53 + CometBFT (Mainnet 14, October 2025)
Open source Yes
Licence Apache 2.0
Languages Go (Cosmos SDK modules), CosmWasm/WASM (enabled Q4 2025)

Commit Activity

55 commits last 52 weeks -100% 4w trend
Jun Aug Oct Nov Jan Mar May 8/wk
Stars
1.1K
Forks
267
Contributors
34
Last Commit
2026-06-01
console

Community

Discord
23.8K
Telegram
8.8K
X Followers
128.0K

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-06-01

Tokenomics deep dive

Token utility

  • Staking to validators (secure the network, earn inflation rewards)
  • Governance voting (on-chain proposals, 300+ to date)
  • Payment for compute deployments (settlement currency)
  • Provider incentives (earn AKT for serving workloads)
  • Take fee revenue (network collects percentage of deployment spend)
  • BME mechanism (burn AKT to mint ACT compute credits, when activated)

Supply

Supply breakdown: Circulating 74.1%, Locked / Unmined 25.9% 74.12% circulating
Circulating 74.1%
Locked / Unmined 25.9%
Max supply Total supply Circulating Circ. %
-- 391,200,000 290,000,000 74.12%

Allocation

Mining (block rewards) 70.94%
Investors 10.03%
Team & advisors 7.85%
Foundation 5.72%
Ecosystem 2.32%
Testnets 1.45%
Vendors & marketing 1.16%
Public sale (IEO) 0.52%

Method: IEO on BitMax (AscendEX) at $0.3773/$0.7673 per AKT (October 2020). Genesis supply of 100M AKT with breakdown: 34.5% investors, 27% team, 19.7% foundation, 8% ecosystem, 5% testnets, 4% vendors, 1.8% public. Long-term: 70.94% of max supply goes to mining/block rewards. All initial allocations are now fully unlocked. Not a fair launch, but the very modest total raise ($4.1M) and majority mining allocation are notable.

Category % Vesting Cliff
Mining (block rewards) 70.94% Continuous emission via block rewards None
Investors 10.03% 1-year lock then semi-annual graded release 1 year
Team & advisors 7.85% 1-year lock then graduated release 1 year
Foundation 5.72% Partial at TGE, remainder over 24 months None
Ecosystem 2.32% Various grants and ecosystem programmes None
Testnets 1.45% Distributed during testnet phases None
Vendors & marketing 1.16% Various None
Public sale (IEO) 0.52% Unlocked at IEO None

Emissions

Model inflationary
Annual inflation 8%
Emission schedule No halving. Genesis inflation was 54% APY, halving every 3.75 years conceptually. Post-Proposal 283 (March 2025): inflation max reduced to 8%, min to 4%. Cosmos SDK adjusts inflation dynamically to target staking ratio.
Burn mechanism BME (AEP-76): Approved, implementation slated for Q1 2026. Two-token system: AKT (native staking) + ACT (non-transferable, USD-pegged compute credits). Tenants burn AKT to mint ACT at oracle price; providers receive AKT at settlement price. Price appreciation between top-up and payout creates net deflationary pressure. Circuit breaker at collateral ratio < 0.90. At $10M monthly top-ups: immediately purchases ~8.77M AKT, removes from circulation for ~7 days. At current adoption could reduce effective annual supply inflation from 8% to ~5.2%.
Next event BME (Burn-Mint Equilibrium) activation (2026-03-31)

Vesting timeline

1 year 10.03%

Investors cliff

1 year 7.85%

Team & advisors cliff

2026-03-31

BME (Burn-Mint Equilibrium) activation

Staking

Type Delegated Proof of Stake (nominator staking via Cosmos SDK)
Minimum stake 1
Lock-up 21-day unbonding period
Nominal APY 7.3%
Real yield -0.7%
Staking ratio 55%
Risks: Real yield approximately -0.7% to 0% after inflation (staking APY barely offsets dilution); 21-day unbonding locks capital during volatile periods; Slashing risk: 5% for double-signing, 0.01% for prolonged downtime; Validator selection risk -- poorly-run validators can be slashed; Chain migration risk -- staking mechanics may change with new chain; Post-Proposal 283: 50% community pool tax reduces individual staking returns
Slashing: Double-signing: 5% slash. Extended downtime (missing blocks): 0.01% slash and jailing.

AKT currently operates as a standard Cosmos inflationary staking token with real yield near zero after inflation. Post-Proposal 283 (March 2025): inflation max 8%, min 4%, community pool tax 50%. The real tokenomics thesis depends on BME activation (AEP-76, approved, Q1 2026 target): when compute spend is significant enough to burn more AKT than inflation creates, the token becomes deflationary. At $3.15M annual revenue and ~$88M market cap, BME alone cannot drive meaningful deflation yet. All tokens fully vested -- no future unlock cliffs. The gap between the tokenomics vision (revenue-driven burns) and current reality (inflation-dependent staking) is the core investment question. ~96% below ATH. CoinGecko rank #297.

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-06-01

AKT Supply Simulator

Token: AKTSupply: 294.3MMax: UncappedPrice: $0.5877Data: 1 Jun 2026

Scenario Parameters

Revenue growthBase rate: 128% YoY ($2.7M/yr)
128% YoY (current)
Burn efficiencyBase: 5.4K AKT/day (scales with revenue)
1x (current efficiency)
Inflation rateCurrent: ~8.0% annual
8.0% (current)
Staking ratioCurrent: 55% of supply staked
55% (current)
Time horizon
+6.9%
Net annual inflation
Emissions minus burns, annualised
+12.5%
Circulating change (2yr)
294.3M → 331.1M
+12.5%
Liquid change (2yr)
Circulating minus staked tokens
N/A
Burn exceeds emission
Burns never exceed emissions in this scenario
103%
Revenue coverage
Revenue as % of emission value (end of period)

Circulating Supply Projection

131M182M234M286M338MM1M5M9M13M17M21M24
CirculatingEffective (minus staked)

Monthly Emissions vs Burns

0540.1K1.1M1.6M2.2MM1: 2.0M AKT emittedM1: 176.5K AKT burnedM2: 2.0M AKT emittedM2: 189.0K AKT burnedM3: 2.0M AKT emittedM3: 202.4K AKT burnedM4: 2.0M AKT emittedM4: 216.8K AKT burnedM5: 2.0M AKT emittedM5: 232.2K AKT burnedM6: 2.0M AKT emittedM6: 248.8K AKT burnedM7: 2.0M AKT emittedM7: 266.4K AKT burnedM8: 2.0M AKT emittedM8: 285.4K AKT burnedM9: 2.0M AKT emittedM9: 305.7K AKT burnedM10: 2.0M AKT emittedM10: 327.4K AKT burnedM11: 2.0M AKT emittedM11: 350.7K AKT burnedM12: 2.0M AKT emittedM12: 375.6K AKT burnedM13: 2.0M AKT emittedM13: 402.3K AKT burnedM14: 2.0M AKT emittedM14: 430.9K AKT burnedM15: 2.0M AKT emittedM15: 461.6K AKT burnedM16: 2.0M AKT emittedM16: 494.4K AKT burnedM17: 2.0M AKT emittedM17: 529.5K AKT burnedM18: 2.0M AKT emittedM18: 567.2K AKT burnedM19: 2.0M AKT emittedM19: 607.5K AKT burnedM20: 2.0M AKT emittedM20: 650.7K AKT burnedM21: 2.0M AKT emittedM21: 696.9K AKT burnedM22: 2.0M AKT emittedM22: 746.5K AKT burnedM23: 2.0M AKT emittedM23: 799.5K AKT burnedM24: 2.0M AKT emittedM24: 856.4K AKT burnedM1M4M7M10M13M16M19M22M24
EmissionsBurns

Revenue vs Emission Value

0%25%50%75%100%150%200%full coverage103%M1M4M7M10M13M16M19M22M24
Revenue as % of token emission value (emissions x price).Above 100% = revenue covers dilution. Below = net dilutive.

Supply projections only. Token price held constant at $0.5877 (snapshot 1 Jun 2026). BME (AEP-76): active since 23 Mar 2026. 7-day avg net burn: 5,412 AKT/day. This is not financial advice.

How to participate

staking basic

Delegate AKT to validators on the Akash chain. Earn inflation rewards (~7.3% APY nominal). Vote on governance proposals through your validator or directly. 50% community pool tax reduces individual returns.

Hardware None (wallet only)
Min. capital $0.3
Est. returns ~7.3% APY nominal (approximately -0.7% to 0% real yield after inflation and 50% community pool tax)
Barriers: Cosmos wallet setup (Keplr/Leap/Cosmostation), 21-day unbonding period, Validator selection research
View guide →
validating advanced

Run an Akash validator node. 99 active validators (of 270 total). Must be in top 99 by stake to be in active set. Earn commission on delegator rewards (typically 5-10%). Top 100 stakers control 63.2% of voting power.

Hardware Robust server infrastructure, near-100% uptime required
Est. returns Commission on delegator rewards (5-10% of staking yield)
Barriers: Must be in top 99 by stake -- competitive, requires millions of AKT, High-availability server infrastructure, Cosmos node operations expertise, Reputation and trust building
View guide →
node operation advanced

Run a cloud provider node on Akash. List spare compute (CPU, GPU, memory, storage) on the marketplace. Earn AKT from tenant deployments via reverse auction. Permissionless -- anyone with qualifying hardware can join.

Hardware Minimum: 8 CPU cores, 16GB RAM, 150GB SSD. Recommended: 12+ cores, 48GB+ RAM, 500GB+ SSD, 3 machines. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, x86_64 only (no ARM). GPU providers need NVIDIA cards. Own RPC node recommended.
Min. capital $15
Est. returns Variable -- depends on hardware, utilisation rate, and bid competitiveness. GPU providers earn more than CPU-only. Provider calculator at akashcalculator.com.
Barriers: Kubernetes administration skills, Server hardware investment, Reliable unmetered internet, Provider setup and maintenance, Competitive bidding against other providers, 50 AKT minimum provider wallet funding
View guide →
node operation intermediate

Homenode: contribute consumer GPU via simplified provider setup. Early access open beta launched February 25, 2026. Install Homenode OS from USB, boot into it. Dual-boot supported. Phase 1 requires RTX 4090 or RTX 5090 minimum, expanding to RTX 20-50 series, GTX 9-16 series, Quadro.

Hardware RTX 4090 or RTX 5090 GPU (Phase 1). Consumer PC with USB boot capability.
Est. returns Not yet disclosed -- early beta
Barriers: Qualifying GPU ownership (RTX 4090/5090 for Phase 1), Beta software -- expect instability, Limited GPU support in early phases
View guide →
using intermediate

Deploy containerised workloads on Akash as a tenant. Console templates for one-click deployments, or custom SDL (YAML) for advanced configurations. AkashML managed inference at $0.15/M tokens (OpenAI-compatible API). 50-85% cheaper than AWS/GCP/Azure.

Hardware None (Console web UI or CLI)
Min. capital $5
Est. returns Cost savings vs centralised cloud. Not a yield-generating activity.
Barriers: Container/Docker knowledge for custom deployments, AKT or USDC deposit for escrow, No managed services (databases, load balancers, CDN) -- raw compute only
View guide →
governance basic

Vote on on-chain governance proposals. 300+ proposals to date. Quorum requirement: 33.40%. Recent proposal (#308) had 42.31% turnout. Community has rejected proposals for transparency concerns (Proposal #302).

Hardware None (wallet only)
Min. capital $0.3
Est. returns No direct returns. Influence over protocol direction.
Barriers: AKT holdings for voting weight, Understanding of proposal implications
View guide →
building advanced

Build on or integrate with Akash. Four funding mechanisms: Community Pool (on-chain treasury, 50% of inflation), Akash Accelerate (grants), Akash Bounties Board, AkashML partnerships. Student Ambassador Program at Princeton, Cornell, USC, UT Austin.

Hardware Development environment
Est. returns Grant funding available. No direct token emissions to builders.
Barriers: Must propose to community pool via governance or apply to grants programme, Go and Kubernetes expertise preferred, Smaller ecosystem than EVM-based alternatives
View guide →

Developer resources

SDK Available
API Available
Docs quality good
Grants Yes

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-06-01

Usage and traction

Active providers
72
Validators
90
Active leases
750
GPU (active / total)
176 / 261
Daily spend (USD)
$8K
Annual revenue
$3.1M
Compute
Active providers and GPU counts tracked live via Akash Console API (see metrics above). 3.1M deployments created in 2025 (466% growth from 2024). 126,025 new leases (2.2% growth). AkashML managed inference operational since November 2025. ~60% GPU utilisation (self-reported).

Data from: Akash Console API (live), Cosmos REST API, Akash 2025 Year in Review (historical) (2026-06-01)

Q1 2026 (Messari, data as of 31 March 2026): lease revenue $253,250 (-45% QoQ); 583 average daily active leases (-4.4% QoQ); 84 GPUs used / 334 GPUs available (utilisation 33.7%, flat QoQ); 58 average active providers (-8.4% QoQ, lowest in network history); 43,540 new leases (+27.1% QoQ, third consecutive quarter of sequential growth in new lease creation, -5.5% YoY); annualised inflation 8.94%; AKT price +41.6% QoQ to $0.50. Q4 2025: lease revenue $460,510; 610 active leases; 198 GPUs used / 587 available; 63 active providers. Q1 2025: lease revenue ~$1M / 868 daily active leases / 553 GPU avg. Q2 2025: $820K / 659 daily leases / 370 GPU avg (post-spam-attack decline). Q3 2025: $852K / 367 GPU avg. Key customers: Venice.ai (GPU inference, billions of tokens), ElizaOS (default inference via AkashChat API), Morpheus (one-click Console template since April 2025), Gensyn (RL-Swarm H100 nodes since May 2025). Provider count declined throughout 2025-Q1 2026 despite usage flow (new leases) recovering -- spam attack, market downturn, and the lease-revenue compression all hurt provider economics. Homenode early-access opened 25 February 2026, accepting RTX 4090, RTX 5090, and Quadro RTX 6000 Ada. Akash Agents platform launched 26 March 2026 (one-click AI agent deployment, includes OpenClaw and Nous Research's Hermes).

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-06-01

Community

Governance

Cosmos SDK on-chain governance. Token-weighted voting with delegation. Any AKT holder can submit proposals (with deposit). Validators vote on behalf of delegators by default; delegators can override. Quorum: 33.40%. 50% community pool tax (post-Proposal 282, March 2025). View →

Sentiment

Community is technically oriented and practically focused. Strong conviction around the 'decentralised supercloud' thesis. GPU marketplace and AkashML re-energised interest. Key concerns: 96% price decline from ATH, chain migration uncertainty, declining provider count through 2025, BME activation delay. Venice.ai's adoption as a customer is frequently cited as validation. Community frustrated by the gap between narrative ('decentralised AWS') and current scale (small provider count, few hundred GPUs). Proposal #302 rejection showed governance has teeth.

Source: OYM Research · Last updated 2026-06-01

Sources consulted (37)
S001 Tier 1
Akash Network Official Documentation
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S002 Tier 1
Akash Network Whitepaper
whitepaper · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S003 Tier 1
akash-network/node GitHub Repository
github · GitHub · Accessed 2026-03-02
S004 Tier 1
akash-network GitHub Organisation
github · GitHub · Accessed 2026-03-02
S005 Tier 2
CoinGecko -- Akash Network
market data · CoinGecko · Accessed 2026-03-02
S006 Tier 2
CoinMarketCap -- Akash Network
market data · CoinMarketCap · Accessed 2026-03-02
S007 Tier 2
Tokenomist -- Akash Network
market data · Tokenomist · Accessed 2026-03-02
S008 Tier 1
Mintscan -- Akash Network
block explorer · Mintscan · Accessed 2026-03-02
S009 Tier 1
Staking Explorer -- Akash Network
block explorer · Staking Explorer · Accessed 2026-03-02
S010 Tier 1
Akash 2025 Year in Review
documentation · Akash Network Blog · Accessed 2026-03-02
S011 Tier 1
Akash Q4 2025 Report
documentation · Akash Network Blog · Accessed 2026-03-02
S012 Tier 1
AkashML -- Managed AI Inference on the Decentralized Supercloud
documentation · Akash Network Blog · Accessed 2026-03-02
S013 Tier 1
AEP-76: BME (Burn-Mint Equilibrium)
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S014 Tier 1
GitHub Discussion #641 -- Inflation and Tax Parameter Changes
governance · GitHub · Accessed 2026-03-02
S015 Tier 1
Overclock Labs -- About
documentation · Overclock Labs · Accessed 2026-03-02
S016 Tier 2
Messari -- State of Akash Q1 2025
research report · Messari · Accessed 2026-03-02
S017 Tier 2
Messari -- State of Akash Q2 2025
research report · Messari · Accessed 2026-03-02
S018 Tier 2
Messari -- State of Akash Q3 2025
research report · Messari · Accessed 2026-03-02
S019 Tier 2
S020 Tier 2
CertiK Skynet -- Akash Network
research report · CertiK · Accessed 2026-03-02
S021 Tier 2
CryptoRank -- Akash Network IEO Data
market data · CryptoRank · Accessed 2026-03-02
S022 Tier 2
ICO Drops -- Akash Network
market data · ICO Drops · Accessed 2026-03-02
S023 Tier 2
Crunchbase -- Overclock Labs
research report · Crunchbase · Accessed 2026-03-02
S024 Tier 2
FinSMEs: Overclock Labs Secures $1.3M in Seed Funding
news · FinSMEs · Accessed 2026-03-02
S025 Tier 3
The Block: Akash Network to Deprecate Its Cosmos Chain
news · The Block · Accessed 2026-03-02
S026 Tier 3
CryptoTimes: Akash Network Plans Major Migration from Cosmos
news · CryptoTimes · Accessed 2026-03-02
S027 Tier 1
Starcluster by Akash Network
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S028 Tier 3
PR Newswire: Akash Launches Early Access for Homenode
news · PR Newswire · Accessed 2026-03-02
S029 Tier 3
IQ.wiki -- Greg Osuri
news · IQ.wiki · Accessed 2026-03-02
S030 Tier 3
IQ.wiki -- Adam Bozanich
news · IQ.wiki · Accessed 2026-03-02
S031 Tier 1
Greg Osuri Congressional Testimony
documentation · US Congress · Accessed 2026-03-02
S032 Tier 2
DAIC Capital: Akash Network Architecture
research report · DAIC Capital · Accessed 2026-03-02
S033 Tier 2
CryptoCrew Validators: Governance August 2025
news · CryptoCrew · Accessed 2026-03-02
S034 Tier 1
Akash Provider Hardware Requirements
documentation · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-03-02
S035 Tier 1
State of Akash Network Q1 2026
research report · Messari · Accessed 2026-05-26
S036 Tier 1
Akashstats
data source · Akash Network · Accessed 2026-05-26
S037 Tier 1
Artemis Analytics — Akash
data source · Artemis · Accessed 2026-05-26